Is additive manufacturing stuck in a rut?

Collaboration and analysis can liberate its full potential.

Ulrich Beckendorff | Germany

AM is still an engineering or innovation topic, rather than a board-level transformation

Despite the early hype, many manufacturers want business cases, repeatability, and reliability. The challenges are daunting: integrating hardware, software, post-processing, quality, and business strategy into a single operating model. The skills, governance, and process maturity to scale from pilot to production are often missing in action. And when it comes to executive hiring, many manufacturers have trouble defining a brief.

Leadership Lens Industrial October 5 26 Steve A Johnson Siepncs1zjg Unsplash

Breaking the rut

At the close of 2025, Apple announced that 3D additive printing for its Apple watch cases, using 100% recycled aerospace‑grade titanium powder, had reduced raw titanium consumption by 50%. 400 metric tons were saved, in a significant step towards its 2030 decarbonization goals.1

At 35,000 feet, you need serious engineering muscle. In 2014, an Airbus cabin bracket quietly evolved. Printed from titanium powder, the pioneering A350 component was bionic and topology-optimised. It proved that additive manufacturing could deliver a flight-ready part that was not only structurally functional, but roughly 30% lighter than its traditionally milled predecessor.2

Amongst other innovations, Stratasys prints patient-specific models for surgical preparation and training. Blended photopolymers generate precise mechanical, visual, and tactile properties - from soft tissue to bone-like structures - a finger that bleeds, an intricate lumbar vertebra, and in partnership with Fraunhofer IGD, a prosthetic eye.3

Power cuts: leaders are questioning AM’s scale and economics

Let’s be clear. Additive manufacturing best suits niche applications. It involves more substantial production times and costs than high-speed-cutting technologies. It quickly hits a ceiling in terms of unit volumes and dimensions. Regulation and standardization are also problematic: certification frameworks for additive parts - especially in safety-critical industries - are still undercooked. So too are IP, digital security, and traceability.

Many C-suite leaders lack insights into how AM fits their supply and value chains, fumbling for use cases and cost-benefit ratios. Other blockages are architectural: cumbersome decision cycles, fragmented legacy systems, and pressure on ROI. Risk aversion and complacency linger – especially given the economic turbulence. How can manufacturers break out of the rut?

Treated as a strategic industrial capability, AM boosts competitiveness

The answers lie in the sectors who are successfully adopting this astounding technology. Aerospace, thanks to lightweighting, low-volume production, and certified high-value parts. Medical devices and healthcare, because of customization, patient-specific solutions, and relatively high margins. Specialized tooling, spare parts, and niche serial manufacturing, due to the agility and localization of production units. The AM ecosystem is growing.

The leading machine tooling company DMG Mori, a Japanese German fusion, extended into digital manufacturing in 2016, systematically expanding its digital manufacturing and software business around ‘CELOS’ and related solutions. While not publicly reported as a separate percentage, these offerings are seen as major growth drivers behind the company’s strong order and revenue performance in recent years.

Moreover, as Apple illustrates, when ‘closed loop material systems’ join the mix, AM can contribute to sustainability. They “improve feedstock availability, reduce exposure to supply disruptions, and enable greater reuse of valuable metals,” a recent White Paper signaled.4

In a nutshell, AM accelerates product development, localizes supply chains, reduces weight and material waste, and enables on-demand production. The winners integrate it into digital workflows, building organizational capabilities around it.

What should CXOs be doing?

  • CEO: sets strategic focus and makes the portfolio choices.
  • COO: owns operational integration and scaling.
  • CIO/CAIO: enables data, automation, workflow, and system integration.
  • CHRO: closes the skills gap and builds the talent pipeline.
  • CFO/CRO: validates economics, risk, and investment discipline.

Here’s another challenge. In most C-suites, AM sits between engineering, operations, and digital functions. Building it out requires a unified, cross-functional mindset, led by the CEO. Beyond installing project teams, task forces or committees, this means learning from other C-suite specialisms. Interrogating AM’s place in the entire value chain. Diving not only into your own business, but that of your customers - and even their end users.

The best boards and C-suites define clear use cases, accountable owners, and measurable economics. This is how a lab experiment scales up into a durable industrial advantage. Of course, there is a place for experimentation. Spinning off a unit and transforming it into an agile, innovative AM organization is one way to incubate it. But it must be done purposefully.

The new leadership profile. From: “design for what we can already make” to “design for what additive can enable.”

Understanding AM technology and its adoption requires experience in digital manufacturing, industrialization, and cross-functional transformation: a combination of systems thinking, data literacy, application engineering, quality discipline, and change management – including stakeholder education.

But, reflecting the AM domain, the talent pool is underdeveloped. Education is lagging. The national importance of manufacturing is fueling the hiring war: competition between markets is complicating cross-border hiring. And if poaching an executive from an AM machine builder might seem like a smart move, this could destroy an invaluable commercial relationship.

Preparing the hire

To handpick the best, you’ll need an incisive hiring strategy informed by a robust upfront analysis. What is the business case for AM? Where does it fit in our business – now, and going forward? Who owns it? How collaborative is our C-suite team? What is the candidate’s purpose, mandate and KPIs? When it comes to experience, competencies and mindset, what are our real priorities?

The real priorities

Knowledge: Invite an AM machine builder to examine the nuts and bolts of business. Several offer cutting technologies (drilling, lathe, and turning), and AM machines. Where does each one fit your value chain?

People: The CEO of an AM machine builder has a young, talented manager and a close relationship with a manufacturing client. She sends him to spend three years in the client’s team to establish the technology and return with inside manufacturing knowledge. This exchange takes grit, maturity, and a long-term, collaborative vision.

Reverse engineering the thinking traps

Many answers lie in the ecosystem: sharing knowledge (and even people) with 3D printer manufacturers.

Exploitation versus exploration. Competition versus collaboration. These strategic paradoxes find their perfect expression in the tantalizing world of additive manufacturing. Leaders who resolve them will get the best of both worlds, exploring to exploit, collaborating to compete.

Additive manufacturing supplements layers, additive thinking unpeels them: unpacking the value chain to identify real opportunities for sustainable performance. 



1 ‘Mapping the future with 3D-printed titanium Apple Watch Cases.’ Apple Newsroom, November 18, 2025.

2 ‘Breakthrough for future Airbus A320’ Airbus, March 3, 2016

3 Hayley Everett (2021). ‘Fraunhofer IGD improves Cuttlefish software for Stratasys PolyJet 3D printing.’ 3dprintingindustry.com, August 3, 2021.

4 Additive Manufacturing Research and Continuum Powders, (2025). ‘The Closed-Loop Materials Era.’

Contact